Automated test findings
axe-core rules, a keyboard walk-through, a 320-pixel reflow test and measured colour contrast, clearly labelled as automated.
Automated accessibility tests plus AI review of up to 5 pages of your website, on desktop and phone, with a plain-English suggested fix for every finding.
Honest by design: no human specialist reviews it. It is not a full WCAG audit, a certification or legal advice, and every report lists what it didn't check.
Every finding says where it came from, who it affects and what to change, so your web person can act on it the same day.
axe-core rules, a keyboard walk-through, a 320-pixel reflow test and measured colour contrast, clearly labelled as automated.
What rules can't catch: unhelpful image descriptions, confusing page titles, links that go nowhere, with suggested wording you can paste in.
Copy-paste suggested fixes in priority order, plus a plain list of checks that were not performed, so you know where coverage ends.
These come from our published sample: a review of a free, open-source coffee-shop website template. They are not from a client.
Amber text on cream at 1.65:1 contrast (4.5:1 needed). Suggested fix: change the colour to #8a5410 (4.91:1) and add hidden “Today:” text for screen readers.
Automated rules pass this because alt text exists. AI review viewed each photo and suggested a description, e.g. “A fresh butter croissant served on a small wooden tray”.
Screen-reader users and browser tabs can't tell pages apart. Suggested fix: unique titles such as Hours & Location | Business Casual Coffee.
In the sample, suggested fixes were applied to a copy of the template and the automated tests re-run: 0 rule failures afterwards.
Pay securely through Stripe and enter your website address, plus any pages you want included.
Automated tests and AI review run on up to 5 public pages, on desktop and phone. We never submit your forms.
An accessible PDF report by email, checked against PDF/UA-1, with the suggested order of work on page one.
After you make changes, ask within 30 days and we re-run the tests on the same pages, reporting only changes we can verify.
No, and we don't claim it will. The report lists problems found against selected WCAG 2.2 Level A and AA criteria on the pages tested, with suggested fixes. If you've received a legal demand, please talk to a lawyer.
No. Automated tools and an AI model do the testing. No human accessibility specialist reviews the findings, and we don't test with people who use assistive technology. The report says this on page one.
No. We only load your public pages. We never log in, submit forms or place orders. Your web person, or you, applies the suggested fixes.
Yes, for public pages. Where the platform controls the code, we suggest the setting or theme option to change, or what to ask the theme's support team.
Pages behind a login, third-party checkout and embeds, PDFs, video captions, mobile apps, testing with screen readers, and the parts of WCAG that need human judgement. Each report lists exactly what was not checked.